Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-01-15 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, having an 81.9 score against 80.3. Google Pixel 4's body has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, but it is lighter. Google Pixel 4 features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a little better pixel quantity in each screen inch.
The Google Pixel 4 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 takes better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking photos and video in low light environments, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also counts with a much more mega pixels camera, a way larger back camera sensor and faster video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.