Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-04-07 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 score. Google Pixel 4's construction is notably lighter and a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, even though they were only released 6 months apart. The Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with way more MP.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel 4, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.