Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is slightly better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro's global score of 80.2. Google Pixel 4's construction is a bit thicker but just a little lighter than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, and both were only released with a couple of months difference. Google Pixel 4 has a little bit better screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has higher video frame rates and a back camera with a way better resolution. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
The Google Pixel 4 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.