Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-02-07 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Ochre and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro's 76.6 general score. Google Pixel 4's construction is just a bit thicker but a little lighter than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, and both of them were only released with a few months difference. Google Pixel 4 has a slightly better looking screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2280px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro's processor is very similar to the processor in Google Pixel 4, they have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43 percent greater battery capacity. ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 2560x1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.