Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-06-04 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's overall score of 78.1. Google Pixel 4 is an older and a little bit thicker cellphone than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but Google was able to make it lighter anyway. Google Pixel 4 features a slightly better display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher display pixel density.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a processor that is very similar to the CPU in Google Pixel 4, and although the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has 2 GB more RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra captures way better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a much more MP back camera and a bigger aperture to take better low light captures. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 4 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.