Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-11-19 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, getting a 93.3 score against 87.5. IPhone 13 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, and Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with Android 11 operating system. IPhone 13 Pro's construction is newer and a little thinner than Google Pixel 4a 5G's, but it is also heavier.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a brighter screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater count of pixels per inch of display and a little higher 1170 x 2532 resolution. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro and Google Pixel 4a 5G feature similar memory capacity for applications and games, they have equal internal memory capacity.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a better performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has lesser cpu cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has longer battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity instead of 3095mAh.
Google Pixel 4a 5G captures a bit better photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a higher resolution.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 4a 5G. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 4a 5G, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.