Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-11-19 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has an overall score of 93.2, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G's global score of 87.5. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max construction is newer and a bit thinner, but a lot heavier than Google Pixel 4a 5G. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, and Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with Android 11 operating system.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a bit better screen pixel density, a better resolution of 1284 x 2778 and a little bigger display. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a superior performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 2 less cpu cores , and they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Google Pixel 4a 5G captures just a bit better videos and photos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a better 12.2 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max and Google Pixel 4a 5G have incredibly similar memory for applications and games, both of them have equal internal storage. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 4a 5G. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 4a 5G, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.