Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G's global score of 87.5. The iPhone X body is just a bit thinner than Google Pixel 4a 5G, but it's a little bit heavier and was released 3 years before. The iPhone X counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores and also slower, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone X features a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a quite better screen density. The iPhone X features a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots clearer photos and videos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a bigger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality, a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a back camera with a better resolution.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a much longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 4a 5G. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone X, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 4a 5G, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.