Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Blue and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.84 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is just a bit better than the Google Nexus 6, having an 87.5 score against 81.1. Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction is incredibly newer, a little lighter and thinner than Google Nexus 6. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has newer 11 version and Google Nexus 6 has Android 5.1 version.
Google Nexus 6 features a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory and 4 less cpu cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Google Nexus 6 counts with just a bit better display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a just a bit greater display density.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G captures just a bit better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with a worse 12.2 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light images and video. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much greater storage for games and applications than Google Nexus 6, because it has more internal storage.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features improved battery duration than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 3885mAh battery size.
Google Pixel 4a 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.