Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-11-19 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is much better than the LG G7 Fit's global score of 77. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has older 11 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Google Pixel 4a 5G's body is notably newer, but just a bit thicker and a bit heavier than the LG G7 Fit.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG G7 Fit, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM. The LG G7 Fit has a brighter display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a higher pixel density.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a slightly better camera than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a lot less megapixels back camera and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a lot bigger diafragm aperture. LG G7 Fit features a much greater memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with superior battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 30% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.