Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is a bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ's 82.7 global score. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a newer phone, and it is also lighter and a little thinner than LG G8X ThinQ. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10 version, giving a lot of extra features.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little faster processor than Google Pixel 4a 5G. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cpu cores. LG G8X ThinQ has a display that is very similar to the Google Pixel 4a 5G one, because although the LG G8X ThinQ has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG G8X ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG G8X ThinQ features a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size back camera sensor and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a better resolution back-facing camera and a bigger aperture.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G8X ThinQ. If you want to save some money, you can buy the LG G8X ThinQ, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.