Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Titan gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is a little bit better than LG K92, with an 87.5 score against 85.4. Although Google Pixel 4a 5G and LG K92 were released only 0 months apart, Google Pixel 4a 5G is a little bit thinner and lighter. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the newer 11 version while LG K92 has Android 10.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a slightly better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has just a little better processing power than LG K92. Both have a 6 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores.
The LG K92 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the LG K92 also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
The LG K92 features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG K92 counts with just a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it costs more than LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG K92. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4a 5G, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG K92, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.