Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Mirror black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the LG Q70, getting a overall score of 87.5 against 77.9. The Google Pixel 4a 5G body has the same thickness than the LG Q70, but it is lighter. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a more recent 11 version and LG Q70 has Android 10 version, so it counts with a lot of extra features and improved performance.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better hardware performance than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a slightly better screen than LG Q70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a just a bit higher screen pixel density.
The LG Q70 captures slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG Q70 also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
The LG Q70 features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 counts with just a little better battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a lot more money than the LG Q70, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.