Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Holographic white |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is better than LG Stylo 6's 76.7 general score. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the newer 11 version and LG Stylo 6 has Android 10, providing some additional features. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design is a little bit thinner and extremely lighter than the LG Stylo 6, even though both of them were released with only a few months difference.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little sharper display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little higher amount of pixels in each display inch. LG Stylo 6 features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The LG Stylo 6 features a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery size. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos, a much better (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
Google Pixel 4a 5G is way more expensive than the LG Stylo 6, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.