Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-11-19 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is just a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ, having a general score of 87.5 against 82.5. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design is incredibly newer, but just a little thicker and just a bit heavier than the LG V30S ThinQ. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has an older 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. LG V30S ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with better battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a lower (4K) video quality, a way worse resolution camera and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a larger camera sensor taking higher quality photographs.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Google Pixel 4a 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.