Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's score of 81.3. Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction is notably newer than LG V35 ThinQ's, although it's just a little heavier and a little thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little faster processor than Google Pixel 4a 5G. Both have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880. The LG V35 ThinQ has a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has an 18 percent larger battery size. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and/or video in low light situations, a way less mega pixels back-facing camera and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG V35 ThinQ, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.