Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is just a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's score of 81.2. The Google Pixel 4a 5G body is incredibly newer and a little bit lighter, but a bit thicker than the LG V40 ThinQ. These devices come with Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the newer 11 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it provides you some extra features.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a little bit larger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a higher pixel density. The LG V40 ThinQ has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has improved battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has an 18 percent more battery size. LG V40 ThinQ and Google Pixel 4a 5G both feature really similar cameras, because although the LG V40 ThinQ has a back facing camera with lesser megapixels resolution, a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a smaller sensor capturing worse quality videos and images, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V40 ThinQ. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V40 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.