Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G, having an 87.6 score against 87.5. Although the LG V60 ThinQ is better than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, we must highlight that it is also way heavier and just a little thicker. Both devices in this comparison review come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little more vivid screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a way higher video definition and a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with improved battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 29% greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, LG V60 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.