Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is a bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G, with a general score of 91.2 against 87.5. Even though LG Wing is better than Google Pixel 4a 5G, it must be told that it's also extremely heavier and thicker. Both of these phones use Android OS, but LG Wing has an older 10 version while Google Pixel 4a 5G has Android 11.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with just a bit better looking display than LG Wing, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. LG Wing has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Wing features a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG Wing features a way better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG Wing also counts with a much more mega-pixels back camera and a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
LG Wing counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 3 percent larger battery size.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 4a 5G. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel 4a 5G, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.