Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's general score of 78.5. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a a little thicker device than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but they have the same weight. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger sensor and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's storage to store more games and applications is just as good as Google Pixel 4a 5G's one, they have the same 128 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a bit superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 13 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.