Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro's overall score of 86.3. Google Pixel 4a 5G's design has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, but it is just a bit lighter. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a much bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a back facing camera with a lot higher 50 MP resolution and a bigger aperture.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 16 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.