Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, with a score of 87.5 against 87.1. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14. Although the Google Pixel 4a 5G is extremely older than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it's construction is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a sharper display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a little worse number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography in low-light situations, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor and a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.