Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | LTPS |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is just a bit better than the Moto G 5G, having an 87.5 score against 81.5. Even though the Google Pixel 4a 5G and the Moto G 5G were only released with a couple months difference, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is lighter and thinner. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the newer 11 version and Moto G 5G has Android 10.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit better screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixel amount in each inch of display. The Moto G 5G features a very superior memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better CPU than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Motorola Moto G 5G features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola Moto G 5G also counts with a back camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto G 5G has longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.