Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than Moto G Power, getting an 87.5 score against 76.1. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Moto G Power, even when both of them were released with only 7 months difference. Both devices in this comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding operating system features.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixel quantity per inch in the display and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G Power has more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. Moto G Power has longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a bit better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels, and they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a bigger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Power. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto G Power, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.