Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than Moto G Stylus (2021), having an 87.5 score against 79.3. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a a little bit thinner and a lot lighter cellphone than the Moto G Stylus (2021), even when they were released only 2 months apart. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better processing power than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a bit better display than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density. The Moto G Stylus (2021) has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a F1.7 camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) has just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.