Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is much better than the Moto G7 Plus's global score of 76.1. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version and Moto G7 Plus has Android 10 version. The Google Pixel 4a 5G body is newer, just a little thinner and a little bit lighter than Moto G7 Plus.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has just a bit better looking display than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a just a little better pixel density and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Moto G7 Plus has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better processing power than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a 5G has better battery lifetime than Moto G7 Plus, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G captures clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a worse video quality and a much less megapixels back facing camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.