Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than Moto G8 Power, getting an 87.5 score against 76. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has newer 11 version and Moto G8 Power has Android 10, so it offers a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations. Even though Google Pixel 4a 5G and Moto G8 Power were released with only a couple months difference, Google Pixel 4a 5G is thinner and lighter.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better processor than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a lot less mega pixels camera in the back and a lower video quality, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs.
The Moto G8 Power features a better storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G8 Power has longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.