Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the Moto G9 Power, having a global score of 87.5 against 78.6. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version and Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version, so it gives a lot of extra features. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is thinner and lighter than the Moto G9 Power, although they were only released 1 months apart.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much better looking screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much greater pixels number per inch in the screen and a way higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Motorola Moto G9 Power has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Moto G9 Power has a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 54% larger battery size. The Moto G9 Power captures slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photography, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto G9 Power also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.