Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, with an 87.5 score against 77.4. Google Pixel 4a 5G's body is much newer, but way thicker and somewhat heavier than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a processing unit that's just as good as the processor in Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although the Moto Z2 Force Edition has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a back-facing camera with a higher 12.2 mega pixels resolution, a larger aperture for better photos in low-light situations, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a larger back camera sensor.
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 42 percent larger battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 4a 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.