Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the Moto Z3 Play, getting a overall score of 87.5 against 76.3. Google Pixel 4a 5G's design is extremely newer than the Moto Z3 Play's, although it's thicker and just a bit heavier. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a quite greater amount of pixels in each display inch, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite larger display. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G captures a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, a same size sensor and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a more MP back camera.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 3885mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Google Pixel 4a 5G costs the same than Moto Z3 Play, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.