Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is a little bit better than Motorola One Hyper, with an 87.5 score against 79.8. Both devices we are comparing use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Google Pixel 4a 5G's design is newer, lighter and a little bit thinner than the Motorola One Hyper. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a just a little higher display density. Motorola One Hyper counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Hyper has a better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures or videos in low light situations and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Motorola One Hyper features just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery size.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a lot more money than the Motorola One Hyper, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.