Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Meteor grey |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW's overall score of 80.3. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the newer 11 version while Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a a little bit thinner and much lighter device than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, even though they were released with only a couple months difference.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than Nokia 8 V 5G UW. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit more vivid display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a much greater storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a greater camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with a way bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.