Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is better than Nokia 9 PureView's 76.4 score. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is newer and just a little lighter than the Nokia 9 PureView's, although it is just a little bit thicker. Nokia 9 PureView has a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a better pixel density.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount. Nokia 9 PureView features as much storage capacity for apps and games as the Google Pixel 4a 5G, they have equal 128 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 4a 5G captures a bit better pictures and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality, better video frame rates, a larger camera aperture and a camera in the back with more megapixels.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with improved battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 17 percent greater battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.