Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | -- |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is a bit better than Nokia XR20's 80.8 global score. Google Pixel 4a 5G's body is a lot thinner and a lot lighter than Nokia XR20, even though both were released with only a couple of months difference. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding OS features.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Nokia XR20. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM. The Nokia XR20 has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little larger screen.
Nokia XR20 captures a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking photos and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a bigger sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Nokia XR20 features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Nokia XR20 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. Nokia XR20 has better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4630mAh battery size against 3885mAh.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.