Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2, having a general score of 87.5 against 79.7. Even though Google Pixel 4a 5G and the OPPO Find X2 were only released with a few months difference, Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction is lighter but a little thicker than the OPPO Find X2. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 has Android 10 version, so it provides the user lots of additional features.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with a sharper display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a quite better screen density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a little bigger display. OPPO Find X2 counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X2 features a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has 6 GB more RAM. OPPO Find X2 counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4200mAh battery size. The OPPO Find X2 takes much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, a F1.7 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 also has a lot better resolution back camera and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.