Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro's general score of 83.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lighter and a bit thinner phone than OPPO Find X2 Pro, even when they were released only 6 months apart.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a just a little better pixels density, a bit bigger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a lot larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a much better 48 MP resolution back camera.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4260mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.