Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-19 | -- |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | -- |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 global score. Both devices in this comparison have the same Android 11 OS, so both should give you identical OS features. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a just a little lighter but just a little bit thicker phone than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 6 GB more RAM. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a quite lower pixel amount per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit larger screen.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G captures better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.