Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A22's 76.1 overall score. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner device than Samsung Galaxy A22, even though they were only released with a few months difference. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A22 has Android 12.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a sharper screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a much greater display pixels density. Google Pixel 4a 5G has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture and a lot better (4K) video resolution. Samsung Galaxy A22 has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.