Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's 84.6 general score. Both phones we are comparing come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding operating system features. The Google Pixel 4a 5G body is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, even when both were released with only 7 months difference.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixel quantity per inch in the display. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G takes a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and videos and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A22 5G has superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.