Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is slightly better than Galaxy A25 5G, with an 87.5 score against 79.9. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has older 11 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14. Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is noticeably older than Galaxy A25 5G, it's construction is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a quite larger screen. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a very superior performance than Galaxy A25 5G. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G takes slightly better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, a smaller sensor shooting worse quality photos and videos and a tinier aperture which is worse for low light captures and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera with a much better resolution.
Galaxy A25 5G features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G features longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.