Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A30's global score of 79.6. Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is newer than the Galaxy A30, it's a little bit heavier and a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A30, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little sharper display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy A30 features a quite bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a lot less megapixels back camera, and they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a much better video quality and a bigger camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy A30 features a little longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.