Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is slightly better than Galaxy A30s's 79.8 score. Both phones we are comparing here come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should give the same OS features. Even though the Google Pixel 4a 5G is newer than Galaxy A30s, it's a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater pixels count per inch in the screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A30s has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A30s also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 4a 5G takes slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a back camera with much less mega pixels, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A30s features just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 3% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.