Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a little bit better than Galaxy A50, getting an 87.5 score against 83.8. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a newer device than Galaxy A50, but it is just a little heavier and a bit thicker. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a slightly better display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a little bit better display density.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a back camera with a much lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a larger back camera sensor taking better quality photos and videos.
Galaxy A50 features a much greater storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A50. If you want to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A50, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.