Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, having a global score of 90.8 against 87.5. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, we must note that it's also a a little thicker and heavier cellphone. Both phones in this comparison use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A51 5G. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 cores. The Galaxy A51 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back and a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a little longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A51 5G is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.