Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a 5G's 87.5 global score. Galaxy A52 is a heavier and just a bit thicker phone than the Google Pixel 4a 5G. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen pixel density.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A52. Both have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy A52 features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a little better battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 16% greater battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 features a superior camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.