Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4a 5G's overall score of 87.5. Even though Galaxy A52 5G is a better phone than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, we must tell that it is also a somewhat heavier and a little thicker phone. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS, but Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version and Google Pixel 4a 5G has Android 11 version.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. They have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way larger back camera sensor and a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.