Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the Galaxy A6, with a global score of 87.5 against 75.8. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a noticeably newer phone than the Galaxy A6, but it's just a little thicker and a little heavier. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a bit bigger screen, more pixels per screen inch and a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has better battery performance than Galaxy A6, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G takes a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a camera with way less mega pixels, and they both have a same size aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a larger sensor taking higher quality videos and photos and a much higher (4K) video quality.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A6, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.