Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2020-11-19 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), having an 87.5 score against 75.8. Google Pixel 4a 5G's body is much newer and just a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s, although it is also just a little bit thicker. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a bit larger screen, a little higher pixels density and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a better camera than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a camera with a lot worse 12.2 MP resolution, it also counts with a way higher video quality and a larger aperture.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.