Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-19 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Clearly white and Just black | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the Galaxy A70, getting a global score of 87.5 against 76.9. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, counting with some additional features and a performance increase. Even though the Google Pixel 4a 5G is a little thicker than the Galaxy A70, it's just a bit lighter and newer.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better display density. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better processor than Galaxy A70. Both of them have 8 cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy A70 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery size.
Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A70, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.