Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2020-11-19 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Clearly white and Just black | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3885mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy F23, getting a score of 87.5 against 84.6. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy F23 has Android 12 version. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better looking display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F23, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy F23, because although it has a much less MP resolution camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better images in low-light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy F23's memory capacity for apps and games is just as good as Google Pixel 4a 5G's one, both of them have equal internal memory capacity. Galaxy F23 has superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.